Skip to main content

A Call to Philosophical Literacy

Philosophy, ideas, culture, intellectual development in the Arts, have been ridiculed by the right-wing “Liberal” political party in Australia. A Coalition Press Release yesterday read:

‘The Coalition would look to targeting those ridiculous research grants that leave taxpayers scratching their heads wondering just what the Government was thinking.

Taxpayer dollars have been wasted on projects that do little, if anything, to advance Australians research needs. For example:

  • The quest for the ‘I’ – a$595,000 grant aimed at “reaching a better understanding of the self”;
  • $160,000 on an examination of “sexuality in Islamic interpretations of reproductive health technologies in Egypt”;
  • a $443,000 study into “The God of Hegel’s Post-Kantian idealism”; and
  • $164,000 for a study into “how urban media art can best respond to global climate change”’

I don’t particularly want to bad mouth my country to the world, but are Australians really this selfish and dumb???????

It’s election time Down Under, and my friends around the world who have caught a glimpse are wondering who put the Kool-Aid in our water?

I understand that spending a million dollars on these research questions may sound like a lot. But spread over  a few years this is a rather average salary p.a. for several academics who are teaching philosophy and publishing in esteemed journals, establishing the credibility and value of Australian universities. These publications rank some Australian universities in the top one-hundred world-wide, attracting hundreds of students from around the globe, who pay $26,000 p.a. fees to attend our universities, contributing to the Australian economy.

In other words, besides contributing to knowledge and understandings of what it means to be human, the benefit of this investment for the Australian tax-payer even in monetary terms far outweighs the cost.

These projects are selected by the Australian Research Council (ARC) who, one might think, know a little more about Australia’s research needs than your average Aussie. People have to learn to think multi-dimensionally.

Just because you may not know what “The God of Hegel’s Post-Kantian Idealism” is referring to does not mean it is a waste of money. But dirty politicians can manipulate the masses by appealing to Australian’s tall poppy syndrome: does ridiculing people who are smarter then you really make you feel better about yourself? Apparently so.

The Australian not-so “Liberal” party’s disregard for philosophy is appalling—almost as appalling as their decision to cut international aid, and their other “make the rich richer and stuff everyone else” policies. But let’s not open that can of worms.

Why Philosophy Matters:

In an article in The Conversation, Patrick Stokes writes:

“[It is] as if the last two and a half thousand years of moral philosophy never happened. We expect people to have views on right and wrong without equipping them with even the most basic tools to ask the relevant questions or assess the answers they’re offered.”

After the research projects that I have conducted into religious indoctrination and structural forms of violence causing environmental destruction and global poverty, I would go as far as proposing that philosophy is the “missing peace”. The whole idea of democracy comes from philosophy are relies on a philosophically literate society to keep it functioning. Democracy is not a thing that can be achieved or given, it is always a work in progress.

“Democracy is something you do not something you get” as Susan George put it at a lecture last week.

The necessary tool to do democracy is thinking. A population of sheep, who can be herded by the Murdoch press, is not a democracy. It is en-route to becoming an Idiocracy.

Australians need philosophy more than ever. We need to learn and teach the youth how to think and act for ourselves, giving consideration to the long-term future of the whole. We need philosophy in our schools, in our universities, in our churches, in pubs and at the dinner table.

If Australians were doing democracy there is no way that the Liberal party would be voted in. If Australians valued philosophy we would do a much better job at doing democracy. I suppose it is no wonder the “Liberals” want to defer funding from the Liberal Arts. Keep the masses non-thinking sheep, and you can use Murdoch to manipulate them as you please.

Philosophy may sound abstract and arrogant academic pompous to people don’t know what it is. But if they were to take a moment to read about it, to come to understand the ways that society today has been affected by the rich history of philosophy, and I suspect that they would come to a different conclusion.

missing peace

Legitimate & Illegitimate Authority

On Thursday evening the widely acclaimed author Susan George presented the Ted Wheelwright Memorial Lecture at the University of Sydney, on the difference between legitimate and illegitimate authority. These are some of my scribbles.

photo3

Susan George started by reminding us that democracy is and will always be a work in progress—something you do not something you get.

The Problems with Neo-liberalism

She put into perspective the new neo-liberal model of politics, which continue to get stronger even after the last financial crash. Financial markets continue to be deregulated, more derivatives are being traded now than ever, the fortunes of those at the top are greater than 2008 and the poor are poorer.

Neo-liberalism has spread around world. It is propagated by those in power for whom it is in their own interests to spread those ideas.

Gramsci said that one cannot rule through force and oppression alone, one has to to penetrate minds. One must take a “long march through institutions”. In the last forty years, the propagators of the neo-liberal model have done just that. They started in the place where ideas are developed and disseminated—in university research—and they have spread out from there.

Large Corporations are in Power

Neo-liberals want to privatise medical and education. They take no care for small and medium business. Why? Because they are run by Trans-National Corporations (TNC).

TNC are in power. It is the TNC that are making government decisions. They are exercising their power without responsibility. It is difficult for citizens to intervene.

Is this power legitimate? In the legal sense: yes. In a valid/justifiable sense: no, I don’t think so. It seems to me that in democratic countries people and those they elect should have power to make decisions in the interests of citizens without TNCs guiding those decisions in the interests of the global corporate class.

Sectoral lobbyists, funded by major organizations, come in guise. Susan George gave an example:

The “Global Food Information Council” pose themselves as the protectors of industry. They pay scientists to create doubt, to publish in respectable journals and papers, and to create debate where there isn’t any. They create fake consumer groups, posing that citizens want freedom of choice in food, even when it’s almost poison. They use scare mongering. They work to prevent legislation that they don’t want.

Private ratings agency are paid by the security companies they are rating. The TNC take advantage of every country without contributing the tax. They try to create regulations that weaken the control of governments.

The big one for Australia is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPPA) – which will allow TNC to sue the State if they think that their “expected profits have been jeopardised”. This could cost millions or billions to tax payers. TNCs do not want limits on Co2. This is an illegitimate use of authority. It is manipulative, deceitful, and serves only a small group of people at the top of The Pyramid of power.

What do the TNC want?

It’s not a conspiracy – its just interests. The TNC can do without democracy. Facts are not enough. Their narrative is very powerful.

Susan George called it “expansionary austerity”. The government cuts budgets and increases taxes in order to essentially take from the poor and give to the rich.

Why do government’s agree to the TNC proposals? Is it because they like to be chums with those at the top? Most of all it is because the neo-liberal narrative is all consuming.

What can we do?

We need to create another story that is more powerful than theirs. We need to insist on legitimate authority, with responsibility.

Media has been manipulated but neo-liberalism has been discredited. Even the IMF says that neo-liberalism doesn’t work, admitting they “made a mistake in the math”.

The media need to understand it. Citizens need to understand it.

And the new story needs to take a “long march through the institutions” just as neo-liberalism did. It needs to evolve into a new cultural hegemony—one that is more peaceful, socially just and environmentally sustainable.

The international political-economic-social system has to see where it is heading. It is running toward a cliff. Unless we can abort!

photo

Stuart Rees (my boss) and my lovely friend Sarah Shores at the after-party at Hermanns Bar.

photo2

Emeritus Professor Frank Stilwell, a mastermind behind more socially just and ecologically sustainable economics, legend lecturer at University of Sydney (with a Facebook fan club to show it), organiser of the Ted Wheelwright Memorial Lecture, and dear friend who I was so fortunate to have many-a lunches with while assisting his and Jake Lynch’s Political Economy of Conflict and Peace class in 2011.

More on the Global Pyramid:

Preserving “The Pyramid”: Why Things Are The Way They Are

YouTube and the Global Pyramid

Blessed by His Holiness the Dalai Lama

On Tuesday 18 June, I shook hands and looked into the eyes of the man who seems to be the happiest man in the world—His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet. More than meeting him, at the end of our event I received a blessing from him. It was very real but also surreal.

935808_10152937125295389_332123771_n

As one might imagine, it takes a lot of work and preparation, and a bit of stress. Ok, a lot of stress. Every detail must be taken care of. Every person must have a seat, but no seat should be empty. This person is responsible for this, that person is responsible for that. So much detail that until the night before I’d almost forgotten: tomorrow I would be in the presence of the Dalai Lama! But would everything run smoothly? Had I forgotten anything? The anxiety-filled mind chatter would return.

When you are an event organiser (which I have inadvertently become), you are the key person for everything on the day. Here or there. Make sure this area is clear. This person doesn’t have a ticket. That person is unaccounted for. Remember to breath.

With a wonderful team of people from the Dalai Lamas office, NSW Parliament House, ABC Big Ideas, and a small number of generous Council members and volunteers, the Sydney Peace Foundation staged an intimate gathering with His Holiness in conversation with Australian compere Andrew West. The doors opened just before 8am, and by 8:25 the Theatrette was filled with high school and university students, the Tibetan Community, and key supporters of the Foundation.

When His Holiness was walking down the long set of stairs into the Theatrette foyer a hush filled the air. The mind chatter disappeared. Quiet.

I peered up at the maroon cloak. A calm energy filled the space. He shook our hands, and we introduced ourselves. Took a photo. Put on the microphone. And he entered the Theatrette.

A new hush. Silence.

The audience stood in awe of his presence. He let out friendly chuckle as he walked down the aisle. To the front, he stood in the centre stage. Hands in prayer. Blessed the space. On stage, he took his seat. Andrew joined him. And the discussion began… His words rang true, as if directed at me.

“Religious institutions, not religion, cause violence.”

“Religious violence comes from a singleness of mind.”

“Be true to your tradition, but don’t be attached to it.”

“I am a Buddhist,” He chuckled, “so I can not be attached to Buddhism.”

I wondered if I should be be more open to Christianity. Not in the sense of believing in supernatural spooks in the sky, or in the sense of conforming to the doctrinal interpretations of Christianity as an institution, but in the sense of appreciating the history of my ancestors. Have I lost this appreciation? I’m not sure.

While writing my thesis on panentheism and peace, when I come across scholars who have an intention to convert people to a fundamentalist Christianity (in the sense of believing in a literal interpretation of the Bible and a belief in its inerrancy) I turn off. I simply cannot entertain the notion that Christianity is the only way to heaven or peace.

As His Holiness observed, “if you think there is a creator, then the creator must have created Buddhism too.” If it weren’t for the arrogance embedded in some Christian domination’s exclusive approach to God I’d be much more into it.

Many forms of Christianity are not like this – for example, the Uniting Church and the “Emerging Church” interpret the Bible in its historical context, understanding the elements written as myth and Midrash, and find far meaning in it this way. In particular, I’d like to visit the Unitarian Church, which is explicitly panentheistic. But all in good time… for now I’ll sit with my blessing, do my yoga, write my thesis, and contemplate the marvels and surprises that life brings when one is open, works hard, seeks and persists.

At the close of the conversation, His Holiness blessed a number of people who had made significant contributions to the event:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_iB1VswKAQ[/youtube]

 

480212_10152937125300389_1779460702_n

179792_10152937125325389_1234955516_n

1025899_10151738714503487_1173859061_o

 

[hr]

Following the conversation His Holiness said a few more words about the values of human rights, dignity, well-being, nonviolence and compassion, and how promoting these values can help bring about a more peaceful world:

View the broadcast of “Ethics for a Whole World” : His Holiness in conversation with Andrew West – on ABC Big Ideas http://www.abc.net.au/tv/bigideas/stories/2013/09/23/3853188.htm

 

 

You are the Big Bang, if it weren’t for your “Discontinuous Mind”

It is a common misinterpretation of the Theory of Evolution to think that there is a clear line between species—this is what Richard Dawkins calls “The Tyranny of the Discontinuous Mind.” If we are connected in time to all species, then are we not also connected to the big bang? In fact, within such a continuity, can we not define our selves as the Big Bang, expressing itself in different forms? Let’s explore Dawkins’ tyranny along with my all time favourite, Alan Watts.

In The Ancestor’s Tale, and further elaborated on in an online article called “The Tyranny of the Discontinuous Mind,” Dawkins points out that there was no “first Homo sapien.”[1] Every generation of our ancestors ‘belonged to the same species as its parents and its children.’ If we travelled back in time to meet our ‘200 million great grandfathers’, we would eat him ‘with sauce tartare and a slice of lemon. He was a fish.’[2]

Dawkins emphasises, ‘Evolutionary change is gradual: there never was such a line, never a line between any species and its evolutionary precursor.’[3] There is an unbroken lineage going back through history that connects us with every one of our ancestors. At every step along the way, one generation of our ancestor could breed with another of its being from numbers of generations before and after.

Dawkins illustrates this with the tale of the herring gull and the lesser black-backed gull in the Arctic Circle.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEtnyx0Yo9I[/youtube]

The herring gull and the lesser black-backed gull are two different species, named the Larus argentatus and Larus fuscus, that do not breed with each other. Dawkins refers to these gulls as ‘ring species’ as ‘at every stage around the ring, the birds are sufficiently similar to their immediate neighbours in the ring to interbreed with them.’[4]  Yet when the ‘ends of the continuum are reached’ in Europe, these birds live side by side but do not interbreed with each other. Dawkins calls explains that ring species like the gulls ‘are only showing us in the spatial dimension something that must always happen in the time dimension.’[5]

The point of this tale is to demonstrate that what we perceive to be discontinuities between species is due to the limitations of our mind, existing inside this particular period of time. Mapping evolution through time is much like mapping the transition from the herring gull to the lesser black-backed gull across Europe. What does this mean? It means that ultimately humans are connected to all other species and micro-organisms tracing back to the Big Bang.

Let me illustrate the significance of this with a Wattsian metaphor.

Imagine that a bottle of black ink thrown on a large white wall. Taking ‘for the sake of argument’ that the Big Bang was the way it happened, the black ink represents a primordial explosion, that ‘flung all the galaxies out into space’. The ink splatters outward. It is very dense in the middle and has squiggly bits on the outer edges. It is common for us to think ourselves only a speck of ink on the outer edge of this 14 billion-year process, but we are not: we are the whole thing. Watts explains:

‘If you think that you are only inside your skin, you define yourself as one very complicated little curlicue, way out on the edge of that explosion. Way out in space, and way out in time. Billions of years ago, you were a big bang, but now you’re a complicated human being. And then we cut ourselves off, and don’t feel that we’re still the big bang. But you are. Depends how you define yourself.’ [6]

In this view, ‘You are the big bang, the original force of the universe, coming on as whoever you are.’ [7]

We have forgone the ‘proper self-respect’ that comes with recognizing that ‘I, the individual organism, am a structure of such fabulous ingenuity that it calls the whole universe into being.’[8]

Watts provides a vision of what it means to experience life as a “panentheist”. Panentheism (all-in-God) defines “God” as a cosmic process that we are inside and part of, rather than as something separate like the old notion of a supernatural man judging us from the sky. This insight is found within most religions, but it can get lost in some nit-picking “authorities” interpretation of doctrines, generally connected with power-seeking institutions.

This can shift the way you see and care for yourself, for the other people, and for forms of life including your surrounding ecosystems and planet.

One can think of themselves as the curlicue, a bag of skin, cut off from everything else; or one can think of themselves as the big bang, a creative cosmic energy that is still in process—it depends on the standpoint from which one tells their story.

wheeler

Life is asking itself: What is Life? [9]

This is a snippet from my MPhil thesis on the topic of the contribution of panentheism to positive peace.


[1] Richard Dawkins and Yan Wong, The Ancestor’s Tale : A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004. and Richard Dawkins (2013, 28/1/13). “The Tyranny of the Discontinuous Mind”,  Accessed: 10/03/13, http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2013/1/28/the-tyranny-of-the-discontinuous-mind#. Originally published in New Statesman, the Christmas issue for 2011, of which Dawkins was a guest Editor.

[2] Richard Dawkins, The Tyranny of the Discontinuous Mind, Accessed: 10/03/13 p. 4.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Richard Dawkins and Yan Wong, The Ancestor’s Tale : A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life, 2004. p. 303.

[5] Ibid. p. 303.

[6] Alan Watts (1960), “The Nature of Consciousness”, http://deoxy.org/w_nature.htm.

[7] Alan Watts, The Book : On the Taboo against Knowing Who You Are, 1969. p. 118. CHECK PAGE. My emphasis.

[8] Ibid. p. 97.

[9] John Wheeler’s “Participatory Universe”, we are the self-reflexive eye that emerged within life’s story. From Paul Davies, The Mind of God. New York: Penguin books, 1992. p. 225.

Global wealth pyramid – Credit Suisse

If your total wealth is over 1 million dollars you are in the top 0.5% of the global wealth pyramid.

If you have between 100k and 1m, you are in the top 7.5%.

If you have somewhere between 10k and 100k, you are still in the top third of the global pyramid.

If you own over 50 million dollars worth of assets, you are one of only 81,000 people on this planet.

If over 10 million you are still one of the richest 1 million people out of 7 billion people.

Not to say I know many people with over 10 million dollars, or any, but I do know people with over 1 million. I thought maybe they would be in the top 5%. But the top 0.5%? Wow.

Of course, living costs vary so it’s not completely accurate to say that someone owning $USD10k of assets in Australia is as wealthy as someone owning $USD10k worth of assets in Kenya, for example.

The Global Wealth Pyramid – putting things in perspective…

global wealth pyramid

At the top of the pyramid:Screen Shot 2013-06-07 at 5.15.27 PM

Numerically this computes to:

wealth range million adults % people trillion $ % wealth
>1miillion 24.2 0.5 69.2 35.6
100,000-1m 334 7.5 85 43.7
10,000-100,000 1045 23.5 32.1 16.5
<10,000 3038 68.4 8.2 4.2
4441.2 99.9 194.5 100

Mapped across various countries and continents it looks like this:

Screen Shot 2013-06-07 at 5.13.23 PM

I’m analysing the PDF of the full Credit Suisse global wealth report here as part of my MPhil research.

I’m trying to understand how we can let such vast inequality persist. It gets worse…

Put another way, the most wealthy 300 people own the same as the poorest 3 billion people. This 3 min clip on global wealth inequality explains the distribution:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJtOhfpGlZ8[/youtube]

Is it fair that 300 people own the same as 3 billion??? How can we change the rules so that the system is more fair?

300 people own same as 3 billion

 

Also may be of interest to check out the perceived, desired and actual wealth inequality in the United States:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM[/youtube]

Or learn more on the global wealth pyramid here.

Now that’s perspective.

One Drum: A film about a road trip from New York City to Rio De Janeiro

On 7th day of the 7th month, 2007, I met a person who would inspire a change in my life. He lit a spark of creativity inside me, and pointed to the possibilities that exist if you just fucking go. Soon after our chance encounter (and kiss), I stumbled across his blog www.nyc2rio.com:

On September 13th, 2007 we’re driving out of New York City on an adventure through Central and South America, en-route to Rio De Janeiro.

Aside from making it there in one piece, our journey is about the experience of new cultures, following our hearts and living life the way we want to.

The world is in a fragile state and we feel we must make an effort to give back to the earth by living consciously, sharing love, life and happiness, to ensure the positive development of our planet.

We will be updating this site with more words, pictures and video of where we are, who we meet and what we’re up to – so stay in touch…

Peace

Harley, Steve & Betty

With this opening paragraph, I was hooked.

A year or so later I travelled to South America myself. I didn’t expect to find Betty (the kombi), but I kept my eyes open for her.

Eventually I did find her, and so much more.

The adventure inspired me to write My Brazilian: and a kombi named Betty, tracing my journey from Galapagos Islands through Bolivian Salt Lakes down to Patagonia, then back up to Iguazu Falls, Salvador and Rio for Carnaval. This travel memoir and spiritual journey is now seeking a publisher…

Meanwhile last Wednesday I travelled back to 2009 as I watched a screening of Harley’s film One Drum. More than a film, Harley plays interludes of an original soundtrack live as he narrates Betty’s journey from New York City to Rio’s Carnaval.

one drum2

On the road Betty stops for Harley and Steve to chat with the people they meet about what is valuable and meaningful in life. These conversations hint that happiness is not found in material things, but in following our dreams, giving to others, and living in ways that will allow our planet to may remain vibrant and beautiful for generations to follow.

It was the sixth or seventh screening of his film, but the first time that Steve, Harley, Jack (their friend who joined for the last part of their trip) and I were in the same room since Carnaval in February 2009. We marked the occasion with a photo:

IMG_4362

 

If you are up for a trip to South America without leaving Sydney then I highly recommend this refreshingly honest and creative use of music, philosophy and film. A reminder that the best things in life are often the most simple, and that the greatest adventures come from following one’s intuition and convictions.

Harley is screenings/performing this wonderful show every second Wednesday evening in Paddington, Sydney. For more information visit the One Drum Facebook page.

 

 

 

 

 

“What if God doesn’t DO things? What if God is IN things?”

In his TED Talk, the Canon Pastor of Exeter Cathedral in the UK, Tom Honey, explained some of the dilemmas involved in challenging images and ideas attached to the traditional notion of God within his congregation. He explains the way that ‘most people, both within and outside the organized church, still have a picture of a celestial controller, a rule maker, a policeman in the sky who orders everything, and causes everything to happen,’ and how in time he had become ‘more and more uncomfortable with this perception of God.’ He says, ‘Isn’t it ironic that Christians who claim to believe in an infinite, unknowable being then tie God down in closed systems and rigid doctrines?’

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wdkxdiOFJA[/youtube]

Honey describes his inclination toward more feminine notions of God that that recognise that God is, by definition, unknowable. Such notions are well known ‘liberal academic circles,’ he says, yet church leaders have tended not to share these ideas with their congregations. He explains: ‘clergy like myself have been reluctant to air them, for fear of creating tension and division in our church communities, for fear of upsetting the simple faith of more traditional believers. I have chosen not to rock the boat.’

The tsunami in 2004 provided an impetus for him facing this fear and confronting the ideas that orthodoxy attached to God. Honey could not reconcile the idea that God was in control of the horrific deaths of so many people. He critiques the lyrics of a song they used to sing: “The wind and waves obey Him.” ‘Do they?’ he asks. ‘Does God demand loyalty, like any medieval tyrant?’ Can we really believe in ‘A God who looks after His own, so that Christians are OK, while everyone else perishes? A cosmic us and them, and a God who is guilty of the worst kind of favoritism?’ Honey does not suggest rejecting the existence of God altogether, he suggests questioning what images and ideas we are attributing to God.

‘what if God doesn’t act? What if God doesn’t do things at all? What if God is in things? […] In the natural cycle of life and death, the creation and destruction that must happen continuously. In the process of evolution. In the incredible intricacy and magnificence of the natural world. In the collective unconscious, the soul of the human race […] In presence and in absence. In simplicity and complexity. In change and development and growth.’

Tom Honey’s talk illustrates the difference between what theologians refer to as “classic theism” and “panentheism”, which is what I am currently writing my MPhil thesis on with a full draft due this month (hence why my blog entries are presently few and far between).

A drop in the ocean

“My life amounts to no more than one drop in a limitless ocean. Yet what is any ocean, but a multitude of drops?” ― David Mitchell, Cloud Atlas

On the journey from Sydney to Paris I watched Cloud Atlas. Actually I watched it twice. And I still don’t get it.

cloudatlasbanner9172012

The film is six stories from six times that weave in and out of one another, with actors and actresses playing characters within the different times.

It is terribly confusing, but a clear picture emerges. A distinct pattern that repeats throughout the human story – a tension between  oppression and resistance, of cowardliness and courage, of the contribution of individuals in causing violence and pursuing justice.

The movie resonated deeply with me. I share the struggle of some of the characters, and I suppose of Mitchell, in  “trying to understand why we keep making the same mistakes over and over…”

My take home message (or take on holiday message, as it was) is captured in this quote:

“Our lives are not our own, we are bound to others, past and present. And by each crime and every kindness, we birth our future.”

We may be only a drop in the ocean, but the ocean is maintained and changed by each and every drop.

 

Furthermore:

This might be a useful map (from wikipedia) for when I watch it for a third time:

Actor “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing” (1849) “Letters from Zedelghem” (1936) “Half-Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery” (1973) “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish” (2012) “An Orison of Sonmi~451” (2144) “Sloosha’s Crossin’ an’ Ev’rythin’ After” (2321)
Tom Hanks
Dr. Henry Goose
Hotel Manager
Isaac Sachs
Dermot Hoggins
Cavendish Look-a-like Actor
Zachry
Halle Berry
Native Woman
Jocasta Ayrs
Luisa Rey
Indian Party Guest
Ovid
Meronym
Jim Broadbent
Captain Molyneux
Vyvyan Ayrs
N/A
Timothy Cavendish
Korean Musician
Prescient 2
Hugo Weaving
Haskell Moore
Tadeusz Kesselring
Bill Smoke
Nurse Noakes
Boardman Mephi
Old Georgie
Jim Sturgess
Adam Ewing
Poor Hotel Guest
Megan’s Dad
Highlander
Hae-Joo Chang
Adam / Zachry Brother-in-Law
Doona Bae
Tilda Ewing
N/A
Megan’s Mom, Mexican Woman
N/A
Sonmi~451, Sonmi~351, Sonmi Prostitute
N/A
Ben Whishaw
Cabin Boy
Robert Frobisher
Store Clerk
Georgette
N/A
Tribesman
James D’Arcy
N/A
Young Rufus Sixsmith
Old Rufus Sixsmith
Nurse James
Archivist
N/A
Zhou Xun
N/A N/A
Talbot / Hotel Manager
N/A
Yoona~939
Rose
Keith David
Kupaka
N/A
Joe Napier
N/A
An-kor Apis
Prescient
David Gyasi
Autua
N/A
Lester Rey
N/A N/A
Duophysite
Susan Sarandon
Madame Horrox
N/A N/A
Older Ursula
Yosouf Suleiman
Abbess
Hugh Grant
Rev. Giles Horrox
Hotel Heavy
Lloyd Hooks
Denholme Cavendish
Seer Rhee
Kona Chief

_1351547825

Picture comes from this site, with further breakdown of characters: http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Cloud-Atlas-Infographic-Explains-Karmic-Journeys-Movie-Characters-33823.html

Honouring Outrage: Celebrating Courage in Paris

On 2 May 2013, in Paris, my colleagues and I represented the Sydney Peace Foundation at the Australian Ambassador’s Residence in Paris, where we awarded a posthumous Gold Medal for Human Rights to Stéphane Hessel for his life-long contribution to building a more peaceful and just society.

400px-Europe_Ecologie_closing_rally_regional_elections_2010-03-10_n04

Stéphane Hessel was a German born Jew whose family fled to France who became a fighter in the French Resistance where he was captured, tortured and escaped execution by the Nazis. On returning to Paris Hessel became a diplomat and was a one of twelve members of the committee who drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As the French Ambassador at the United Nations in Geneva, Hessel promoted non-violent responses to conflict and made a stand against human rights abuses.

In 2009 Hessel published a short 30-page book INDIGNEZ-VOUS! (Get Angry! Cry Out!) that became an inspiration to popular protest, particularly the Occupy Movements, around the world. Buy it from Amazon for only $4! The most worthy and yet shortest read I have come across.

outrage

Under its English title Time for Outrage, Hessel encourages citizens of the world to find our “reason for indignation” and “join the great course of history,” helping it to move “toward greater justice and greater freedom.”

He acknowledged that in this “vast, interdependent world” it is not always easy to see whose actions are causing the problems. Yet he reminds us, “there are unbearable things all around us… Open your eyes and you will see.”

Hessel describes two central challenges: “The grievous injustices inflicted on people deprived of the essential requirements for a decent life;” and “The violation of basic freedoms and fundamental rights.”

The widening gap between rich and poor is a reason for outrage, “not only in the third world… but in the suburbs of our largest Western cities.”

We must “not be defeated by the tyrannyoutrage2 of the world financial markets that threaten peace and democracy everywhere.”

Under the heading “Palestine: My Own Outrage” Hessel says, “Israel is not above international laws.”

As a Jew, as a survivor of the Holocaust, and as someone who had visited Gaza and the West Bank many times, his outrage at Israel’s cruelty towards the Palestinians is of particular significance. We must help others claim their rights and grip tightly onto our own—“we must never surrender these rights.”

Hessel calls for: “a rebellion—peaceful and resolute—against the instruments of mass media that offer our young people a worldview defined by the temptations of mass consumption, a disdain for the weak, and a contempt for culture, historical amnesia, and the relentless competition of all against all.”

Hessel believed in the power of people to make a difference.

Stéphane Hessel was originally selected to by the Sydney Peace Prize Jury to be the 16th recipient of the Prize in November. On 6 March 2013 before arrangements for this prize could be made, at 95-years old, Hessel passed away quietly in his sleep.

Following an address by Chair Stuart Rees, and a reception graciously hosted by Australian Ambassador to France Ric Wells, the Gold Medal was be presented to Hessel’s widowed wife Madame Christane Hessel-Chabry.

943473_510286375697354_1387115348_n

My boss, Em. Professor Stuart Rees (left); Madame Hessel-Chabry (centre); and Ambassador Ric Wells (right).

270897_510286289030696_1043473575_n

I was honoured to present a small gift – a silver necklace with dove pendant – to Madame Hessel-Chabry.

944730_510285992364059_82374455_n

The Sydney Peace Foundation hopes that this award will help broadcast Hessel’s words of outrage and hope, and that his legacy will continue to spread and inspire non-violent outrage around the world!

______________________________

Notes:

All quotes in italics are from: Stéphane Hessel (2010) Time for Outrage, translated by Marion Duvert, Hachette Book Group: New York.

The photo of Stéphane Hessel was taken by Marie-Lan Nguyen at Europe Écologie’s closing rally of the 2010 French regional elections campaign at the Cirque d’hiver, Paris.

The second photos shows French Occupy protesters participating in a rally as part of the 63rd anniversary of the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights, on December 10, 2011 in center Paris.

This is an adaptation of an article I wrote for the May 2013 Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Newsletter PeaceWrites which can be downloaded here: http://sydney.edu.au/arts/peace_conflict/docs/PeaceWrites_May_2013.pdf

______________________________

PS. Other highlights of my 4 days in Paris included coffee, croissants, baguettes, flan, wine, cheese, frogs legs, snails, art and love.

968859_10151679139313487_331587751_n

The perfect picnic under the Eiffel Tower

971120_10151679139733487_597939909_n

Morning stop for petit déjeuner

942904_10151679142463487_1830025457_n

Pompidou

936915_510380102354648_1888583679_n

Final comment: the gorgeous dress that I wore to the ceremony in the Ambassador’s Residence is of my sister’s new collection: It will soon purchase from her online store Enough! by Nicole Bennett for $289.